Token Vetting Guide

Why We Vet Tokens

The Token Marketplace is not an open list of any token that applies. Every token passes through a multi-step vetting process designed to:

Reduce the probability of scams, rug-pulls, and fake projects
Highlight projects with real teams, real products, and real users
Provide transparent risk information so investors can make informed decisions
Maintain the reputation and long-term sustainability of the marketplace

Important: Vetting reduces risk but does not eliminate it. Investing in any digital asset remains inherently risky. Investors should always do their own research.

At a Glance: Vetting Pipeline

From Submission to Listing

Every token passes through the following core stages before it can be listed:

Project & documentation submission
Team verification & compliance checks
Technical & smart contract review
Tokenomics & market integrity review
Risk scoring & final approval
Ongoing monitoring & possible delisting

Stage 1: Token Submission & Basic Screening

The vetting journey begins when a project submits its token for listing. At this stage we collect core details and perform a preliminary filter to reject obvious red flags.

1.1 Project Profile

Project owners must submit:

Project name, logo, and token symbol
Official website and whitepaper / litepaper
Core team details and company entity (if applicable)
Roadmap, use-case, and problem statement

1.2 Token Details

Issuers provide:

Contract address and supported networks
Total supply, decimals, and ticker
Minting/burning logic and ownership details
Links to existing listings (if any)

1.3 Initial Filters

During basic screening, we:

Verify that submitted links and contracts are valid
Check for obvious plagiarism or cloned websites
Reject tokens with misleading names or impersonation
Reject tokens explicitly violating legal or compliance rules

Stage 2: Team Verification & Compliance

A project without a transparent and accountable team is higher risk. At this stage, we confirm that the people behind the token are real and that the project structure respects basic regulatory expectations.

2.1 Identity & KYC

Depending on jurisdiction and listing tier, we may:

Request KYC/KYB verification for founders or entity
Validate LinkedIn and public profiles
Screen against sanctions and watchlists

2.2 Legal & Compliance

We review:

Project's terms, disclaimers, and token sale conditions
Jurisdictions targeted/blocked by the project
Potential conflicts with local securities or AML rules

2.3 Transparency Score

Based on the above, we assign an internal transparency score, which influences:

Whether the token is listed at all
Whether the token receives a "Verified Team" badge
How prominently the token is displayed in the marketplace

Stage 3: Technical & Smart Contract Review

Even a legitimate team can launch a risky contract. Our technical review focuses on code behavior, upgradeability, and potential attack vectors.

3.1 Contract Safety Checks

Automated & Manual

Ownership and admin roles (who can change what)
Mint, burn, blacklist, and pause functions
Uncapped minting or hidden backdoors
Upgradeability and proxy patterns
Common vulnerability patterns (re-entrancy, overflows, etc.)

Note: Where available, we review external audit reports and may require a third-party audit for higher-risk configurations.

3.2 On-Chain Behavior

Live Activity Review

Distribution of holders and concentration of supply
Liquidity pool configuration and lock status
Unusual transfer patterns or suspicious activity
Consistency between claimed and actual token mechanics

Where red flags are found, the token may be rejected or only listed with a prominent risk warning.

Stage 4: Tokenomics & Market Integrity

Token economics strongly influence long-term price behavior. We assess whether the supply schedule and incentives support sustainable growth rather than short-term speculation only.

4.1 Supply & Allocation

Total and circulating supply at listing
Allocation to team, investors, community, and reserves
Lockup and vesting schedules for large holders

4.2 Utility & Use-Cases

Actual in-app or protocol utility today
Planned future use-cases, with realistic timelines
Dependency on external factors (e.g., partnerships, regulation)

4.3 Market Integrity

Fairness of launch / distribution model
Liquidity depth and stability plans
Measures to reduce wash trading or market manipulation

Stage 5: Risk Scoring & Listing Decision

Findings from all previous stages are combined into an internal risk score. This drives whether a token can be listed and how it will appear to investors.

5.1 Risk Categories

Internal Score

Each token is assigned an overall risk profile (for internal use and investor communication):

Low Risk – Strong team, clear audits, sustainable tokenomics.

Medium Risk – Some unknowns but reasonable transparency.

High Risk – Significant concerns, only listed with strong warnings or rejected.

Reminder for Investors: A lower risk rating does not guarantee profit. It only indicates our assessment of structural and operational risk, not market performance.

5.2 Possible Outcomes

What Can Happen

Approved & Listed: Token meets our standards. It appears in the marketplace with appropriate labels and disclosures.
Conditionally Approved: Listed only after specific issues are fixed (e.g., liquidity locks, documentation updates).
Deferred: Project must provide additional information or complete pending audits.
Rejected: Major red flags or non-compliance make listing impossible.

How Vetting Appears to Investors

To keep things simple for investors, internal review results are translated into a few easy-to-read labels and status indicators on the Token Marketplace.

Marketplace Status Labels

What You See

When browsing tokens, you may see one or more of the following status labels:

Verified

Core checks passed. Team & contract reviewed.

Under Review

Token is live, but full review is not yet complete.

Audited

External audit report has been provided and validated.

High Risk

Listed with strong warnings based on our assessment.

Watchlist

Under closer monitoring due to recent changes or alerts.

Tip for Investors: Use these labels together with your own research. A "Verified" or "Audited" badge is a positive signal, not a promise of profit.

Ongoing Monitoring & Delisting

Vetting does not stop at listing. The Token Marketplace continuously monitors listed tokens and projects for new risks.

8.1 What We Monitor

Post-Listing

Major changes in token contract or admin roles
Sudden drops in liquidity or suspicious trading patterns
Announcements that contradict previous claims
Community reports about potential scams or misconduct

8.2 Delisting & Warnings

Protecting Users

Warning Banners: Added to the token page when credible concerns arise.
Trading Restrictions: In extreme cases, trading may be limited while issues are investigated.
Delisting: Tokens may be removed if the risk level becomes unacceptable or if the project violates marketplace rules.

When possible, we inform users in advance of delisting and provide guidance on next steps.

Step-by-Step: For Token Issuers

If you are planning to list your token, use this mini-checklist to prepare for a smooth and fast review.

What you should have:

Updated whitepaper or litepaper
Clear one-page summary of your project and token utility
Corporate documents (if operating through a legal entity)
Links to social channels and existing community hubs

Provide your official contract address and network details
Confirm total supply, circulating supply, and allocation breakdown
Declare any special functions (minting, fees, admin controls)

Be ready to undergo KYC/KYB, where required
Keep your public team information consistent across platforms
Provide links to previous projects or experience, if possible

Submit any existing security audits of your smart contracts
Explain your upgrade path and admin key management
Document your liquidity plans and any lock mechanisms

Respond quickly to clarification requests from the review team
Be transparent about risks and limitations of your project
Update your documentation if any major changes are made

For Issuers: Projects that communicate clearly, provide full documentation, and proactively address risks tend to pass vetting faster and receive stronger marketplace visibility.